Comparative analysis of the functional roles of pragmatic markers in documenting the Kosovo and Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the functional roles of the pragmatic markers utilized in the documentation of the Kosovo and Nagorno-Karabakh conflicts. Grounded in the postulate that the pragmatic markers employed in Kosovo's documentation were stronger and contributed to a favorable outcome, namely the attainment of Kosovo's independence, the study contrasts this with the case of Nagorno-Karabakh. According to our postulate, similar markers in Nagorno-Karabakh were less effective and were one of the reasons for the inability to achieve peace through diplomatic negotiations. The disparity in the utilization and effectiveness of pragmatic markers in the documentation of two conflicts, underscores their significance in influencing international recognition, support, and ultimately, the success of diplomatic negotiations.